THE LOCAL NEWS PROJECT I
NATIONAL RESEARCH REPORT
Presented by
Peter Dominowski
Market Trends Research Inc.
|
NEWS SOURCES
OF PUBLIC RADIO LISTENERS
| "What public radio does well is to add depth to
stories. I'm more interested in the national stories than the
local ones but the depth would make any story interesting." |
In The Local News Project research, listeners were asked to specify
the sources they used and preferred for national and local news and
information.
Public Radio
While public radio is a primary source for international, national,
state, and local information for many listeners, most also use other
sources for news.
For many listeners, public radio serves an additional function beyond
the information it provides. They often seem to have an intellectual
and emotional bond with the programming.
|
Public radio news is appreciated both for
the content it offers, and for what it does not have. Listeners
love the intellengence and depth, but are hypersensative to
any reporting that is percieved as sensational or commercial.
|
Listeners feel assaulted by many aspects of commercial media. They
consider much of the programming and advertising an insult to their
intelligence. Their love for public radio news is in part a reaction
to the media world they see around them. Beyond even the programming,
the relative lack of commercialism, and the appeal to thought and
intellect causes them think of public radio as a haven and an oasis.
Many news listeners feel that public radio is valuable and distinctive
because it:
· Provides rational and factual information in a universe
of media hyperbole
· Provides journalistic balance where many listeners perceive
predominantly biased reporting in other media
· Provides depth when many other sources offer little more
than the sound bite
· Provides information that is significant where others concentrate
primarily on murder and mayhem
· Makes sense when many other media provide mostly sensationalism
· Provides a perceived connection with the best of contemporary
thought and culture, and combats a feeling of intellectual or social
isolation expressed by many listeners
· Offers few pundits in a media world saturated with overbearing
buffoonery and conjecture
· Explores the human side of the news without an over-emphasis
on melodrama, or media stars and personalities
· Creates an emotional bond or connection with many listeners
which is not often expressed about most other forms of media
Others have taken aspects of listener attitudes and portrayed public
radio as a virtual community unfettered by geography. While this is
not the exact description used by listeners in this study, their sentiments
and feelings about public radio readily match this overall concept of
a virtual community.
Listeners rely on public radio stations for national, international,
and local news. They value the in-depth reporting and what they call
"human interest" stories. By human interest, they mean
hearing interesting people interviewed, or the humanization of a major
news story or event through talking to one person, or several people,
to discover how the event effects them or influences their life. This
establishes a personal connection to the news for the listener that
no amount of speeches by Prime Ministers or statements by official spokespersons
could ever accomplish.
The responses from listeners generally highlighted the
depth and breadth of public radio news, in contrast with most commercial
news sources that they find limited. The survey results reinforce the
strong dependence that listeners have on public radio for national and
international news.

For national and international news, public radio is favored as a first
choice by a wide margin [more than two-to-one] over all other media.
How do they feel about state and local news?

Most listeners preferred public radio as their primary source of state
and local news, IF it offered the kind of coverage they wanted.
Newspapers were the only other medium seen as a viable option for local
coverage.

A sizable 88% of listeners already feel that public radio is
a useful source for state and local information. Nearly two in three
give the state and local news on public radio the highest rating of
"extremely useful."
Many listeners were effusive in their praise for national and local
news programming on public radio.
· "Quality of local public radio news compared to what?
It's still miles beyond commercial broadcasting on TV and radio."
· "I get very drawn into any story I hear. That's a measure
for me, how much I get into the stories, how interesting they make
it."
Newspapers
Local newspapers, along with public radio, are the overwhelming choice
among listeners as a source for state and local information.
Frequently, listeners reported reading national newspapers such
as the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and even USA Today. Some
listeners read these publications online as well. Their primary purpose
is for national and international news. In most cases, they play a supplementary
or secondary role in a listener's information universe.
Local newspapers received the highest ratings for state and local news
coverage, other than public radio, from surveyed listeners.

Over three of four listeners found newspapers to be useful sources
of local news, and well over a third half felt that they are extremely
useful.
Magazines
Some listeners read the prominent national weekly news magazines, Time,
Newsweek, and U.S. News and World Report. Magazine readers like the
fact that they provide in-depth stories with a different perspective.
They provide a different, in-depth perspective on an issue or event,
and the convenience of being able to skip through the various articles
and choose to read only those of interest.
But some feel that they are becoming more like "People" Magazine
and others simply cannot find the time to read them. Specialized information
magazines, such as Scientific American, Harper's, The New Yorker, and
The Atlantic were also mentioned frequently.
For state and local news, magazines had relatively little use for listeners.

Public and Commercial Television
Listeners mentioned national television network news and network news
programs much more often than local television news. Television sources
cited as important information outlets most frequently were CNN, and
the Jim Lehrer Newshour on PBS. But a sector of the public radio
news audience is averse to television. It was common for several
persons in a focus group to either not own a television set, or to claim
to view very little TV. Local commercial television news (especially
local news) was generally scorned, as too sensational, one-dimensional,
and short on substance.
Listeners saved some of their most vitriolic comments for commercial
television news coverage.
· "It's like a circus, it's amazing the things they'll
do to try to get people to watch."
· "They spend so much time leading up to a story, that
the story is shorter than the lead-in."
· "They waste so much airtime on stuff that has zero impact
on anybody's life and that nobody needs to know about."
· "The local news, no matter what channel you watch, is
worthless."
· "There's very little news in a half-hour show."
· [Local TV news is described as] "a lot of 'news' that's
not news."
For local news, the usefulness of commercial television cannot compare
with public radio or newspapers. Public television fares somewhat better.


Only 10% of listeners rated local commercial TV as very useful for
state and local news!
Public television fared somewhat better with nearly two-thirds of listeners
feeling it was useful as a source of state and local news.
Commercial Radio
Overall, listeners did not rely on commercial radio as a primary
source of news reported in the research. In most markets commercial
radio news was simply not a major factor. Some use commercial newscasts,
but for most the usage was secondary or tertiary.

In the survey, nearly a third one-half found commercial radio somewhat
useful source of state and local news, but only 10% felt it was extremely
useful.
The Internet
Some public radio listeners use the Internet for news, but this
does not appear to have grown to the point that influences occasions
or duration of listening. Most listeners appear to be using the
Internet more as a substitute for newspapers and magazines, rather than
radio or television. Advances in technology and increased access to
the Internet may dramatically change patterns of usage in the future.
But at least for the moment, the Internet does not appear to be a
significant threat to the listening loyalty of public radio's news audience.
The Internet is not the main news source for most listeners, only 3%
indicated in the survey that it was their primary source for national
and international news.

At this stage, less than half of all listeners felt the Internet to
be useful as a source for state and local news.
Perhaps the most significant result of this question is that about
one in four listeners could not respond to this question, suggesting
that they are not connected to or are unfamiliar with the information
content available on the Internet.
News Sources Conclusion
For most listeners, the style of reporting and the amount of local
and state news currently available from other sources leaves something
to be desired. With the exception of newspapers, existing sources do
not generally provide the type and depth of reporting most public radio
listeners seek. The Internet has potential to be a medium for state
and local news, but is currently used more for business, national, and
international information. Public radio and local newspapers are clearly
the most useful sources of state and local news.
|
Given the relatively low levels of satisfaction
with most other sources providing state and local news coverage,
many public stations have a real opportunity to provide a valuable
service to listeners through in-depth state, regional, and local
news reporting.
|
DEFINING LOCAL NEWS
| "That's local to me, something that
impacts me and something that I can have an impact on." |
What exactly is local news? Each station operates on its own definition.
But how do listeners define local news? Listener definitions of local
news are influenced by a combination of geography, experiences, expectations,
and the information they feel is most meaningful and relevant to their
lives.
The programming they are accustomed to also influences perceptions
about local news. Programming that is already featured prominently in
a station's schedule is more likely to be accepted by heavy and core
news listeners.

Listeners in the survey provided their definitions of local and regional
news. The most common definition [41%] for local news was the greater
metropolitan area. Another 26% defined local news either as an area
within the state or as the entire state, while 24% felt that local news
was best defined as their neighborhood, city, or town.

The most common definition of regional news [36%] was an area including
more than one entire state. State news was the most common definition
of 21%. Only 13% of listeners defined regional news as the greater metropolitan
area or smaller.
While public radio listeners are concerned about events in their immediate
community, their interests are not bound to their own neighborhood or
town. One third consider local news to include at least part of, or
their entire state.
THE IMPORTANCE, PERCEPTIONS,
AND QUALITY OF NEWS ON PUBLIC RADIO
| "I get very drawn into any story I hear.
That's a measure for me, how much I get into the stories, how
interesting they make it." |
Every station presents some local information. Do listeners notice
the local news being presented? Are they aware of the in-depth reporting
most public radio stations offer on local, regional, and state issues?
Responses from the focus groups and the survey provide information
about listener perceptions of locally originated news reporting, and
how listeners feel it integrates with national programming.
We know that personal importance is a key concept in listener loyalty
and individual giving. How important is national and international news
to public radio listeners, and how does this compare to their perceptions
of the importance of state and local news?

Not surprisingly, in-depth reporting about national and international
news is vitally important to most listeners. Overall, 95% agree with
this importance, and 66% feel it is very important. This is one of the
highest results in the research, and is a formidable standard to match.
How does the importance of state and local news reporting measure up?

In-depth reporting about state and local news is nearly as important
to news listeners as national and international reporting. Overall,
86% agree with its importance. This differs only slightly from the importance
of national news. But the main difference is in the percentage of
listeners who feel state and local news is very important [49%] versus
the same totals for national news [66%]. This 17% difference encapsulates
listener perceptions.
It might simply be said that listeners like state and local news,
but love the national and international news on public radio.
To more closely examine the perceived quality of public radio news,
listeners were asked to evaluate the overall local and national news
product, and both the newscasts and in-depth local news reporting on
the station.

These questions ask listeners to directly evaluate the quality of national
and local news. As expected, national and international news coverage
on is highly rated, with 62% of listeners considering it to be "excellent,"
and 94% rating it either "excellent" or "good."
The significant result is the comparison between the ratings for national
and local news.
The difference in the overall ratings is significant. Less than half
as many listeners [27%] rate state and local news as "excellent,"
as they do national news. A very respectable 73% rated local reporting
as either "excellent" or "good," but this falls
short of the 94% who rated national news the same way.
The survey also measured perceptions about locally produced newscasts
and in-depth reports on stations.


Both local headlines and in-depth reports received generally good but
not excellent ratings. But it may come as a surprise that local newscasts
were rated slightly higher than in-depth reporting. This anomaly is
explained by listener perceptions and recall.
In focus groups, listeners consistently underestimated
the amount of in-depth news local coverage provided by stations. There
is a gap between the amount of local reporting stations produce, and
listener awareness of it. This is especially true for in-depth local
reports heard within network programs. Although they are aware of their
existence, many listeners could not identify a specific in-depth local
report that they have heard in the past month. At many stations, these
in-depth stories are not heard at specific times. Newscasts are easier
for listeners to remember, since they are generally broadcast at the
same time every day.
In a word, national and international reporting is generally considered
"excellent," while local reporting is considered "good."
Most stations have suspected that there was a gap between listener
perceptions of network and local news importance and quality. Now, for
the first time, these data indicate the size of that gap.
How Do Listeners Know
When the News is Local
During a program like Morning Edition or All Things Considered, most
listeners become aware of the shift to local origination when stations
actually tell them that they are providing a report. Some recognize
the voice of a local announcer, host, or newscaster. A few said that
they become aware of the transition simply because of the time or a
regular change in the format. Others say the transition is so seamless
that they do not always know when programming shifts from national to
local.
Listeners vary greatly in their awareness and perception of local news
inserts. A handful can recite the precise times that local and national
segments transition. But although the majority knows that network programs
also have local content, they do not always remember exactly when this
occurs. They do not consciously carry the Morning Edition clock with
them as they listen.
· "If I'm not out of the shower and shaving by the time
that Carl Kasell finishes the news I know I'm running late!"
· "I guess I don't pay attention to who is doing it."
· "I have no clue when it comes on, it just happens!"
· "It just runs all together."
· "I think some of the local things fit in so well and
organically that you can't tell."
Most listeners do not object to local inserts, and many perceive that
the network programs were designed to allow a certain amount of local
input. From the focus groups is a sampling of listener comments about
transitions between national and local news.
· "It fits real well 'cause mostly I wouldn't know [where
the programming originated] unless they told me."
· "They take an 'intermission' from Morning Edition."
· "It's interspersed [with the network]."
· "The stories interweave pretty well, there's kind of
a cadence to the stories and the way they interweave that you come
to expect."
· "I think it's pretty seamless, 'cause I'm not that aware
of when it is and when it isn't
[local]"
· "I'm just interested in getting the news while I get
dressed and I'm not interested in how they do it."
· "One of the reasons we all listen to NPR is the random
things that come on the air and one of those random things is the
local news."
· "NPR leaves spaces for the local station."
· "They fit in well, the fact that we don't really know
when they're on means they must be good. They're just as good. You
don't realize until later that it's local."
· "They have little pockets [of news] in the morning."
Local and National Reporting
in Network News Programming
Although their perceptions are often different from reality, listeners
are generally aware that local stations produce some of the news heard
during Morning Edition and All Things Considered. How do they perceive
the mix of local and network reporting in these programs? How much locally
originated news do listeners really want? What is the right amount?
Since this is a crucial question, listeners were asked about it several
times in the survey.


Satisfaction with the current amount of local news in Morning Edition
and All Things Considered was expected. The interesting data is for
those who might desire less or more local news at these times. Very
few [less than 5%] feel that the network news programs contain too much
state and local news, or would choose to lessen the current amount.
|
35% of listeners indicated that the current
amount of local news in Morning Edition and All Things Considered
is either minimal or not enough, and 39% would include more
state and local news during these programs.
|
While the 55% who would maintain the current balance of national and
local news is not a call for dramatic changes, there is clear support
for the local news currently with these programs and some incentive
for future expansion of state and local news.
Indicative of the balance that must be struck between national and
local news is the realization that Morning Edition and All Things Considered
cater to the primary interests of most listeners, which is in-depth
national and international reporting.

More than two of three listeners agree that they are generally more
interested in national and international news.
The bottom line is that most news listeners are satisfied with the
current balance of national and local news, but would accept moderate
additions to the amount of local news reporting during Morning Edition
and All Things Considered, IF the reporting was interesting and consistent
with public radio quality standards. But where the report originates
is not the listener's primary concern.
· "Local is just something that may have an effect in
my life."
· "Whatever affects me directly [is local news]."
|
It makes little difference if a report
is produced in their city or state or halfway around the world.
Each report must be produced in a style that maintains their
interest, and the subject must be interesting to them, or made
interesting by the content and the presentation of the piece.
If a report meets these criteria, they will continue listening.
|
Newscasts
What do listeners think about local newscasts, especially during Morning
Edition or All Things Considered? Although public radio listeners value
in-depth reporting, few listeners would replace hourly local newscasts
to accommodate an additional produced piece. The local news summary
remains a valued service for most listeners.
A newscast, for the purposes of this research, is a four to five minute
report of local, state and regional news. A brief fifteen-to-thirty
second recap of local and state headlines is not considered to be a
newscast in this study.
How often should local newscasts occur during drivetime? 64% of listeners
favored local newscasts every hour. Local newscasts every half-hour
were favored by only 25% of listeners.
A full local newscast once per hour is the preferred choice of most
listeners.
PRODUCING A LOCAL
NEWS PROGRAM
Many stations have produced a discrete local news program at one time
or another in their history, with generally disappointing results. Yet,
a large majority [82%] of listeners said they would listen to a half-hour
local news program if it were on at a convenient listening time. 44%
were very likely to listen to this kind of program, and only 19% indicated
that they would not be likely to listen to a discrete local news program.
When would they listen to a local news program? A weekday broadcast
time was a nearly unanimous [92%] choice. If it were to be a weekly
program, Monday would be the preferred broadcast day.
What were the most popular times for a local news program to air? The
top times selected by listeners were:
|
7:00am - 13%
5:00pm - 10%
8:00am - 10%
6:00am - 9%
6:00pm - 6%
7:30am - 5%
9:00am - 5%
12 Noon - 4%
|
Despite this result, it is not recommended that any station begin
production of a discrete local news program. These data are primarily
a strong show of support for local news, as nearly three of four of
listeners agreed that they would consider listening to a local news
program in their prime listening time [between 6 - 9 am and 4 - 6 pm
weekdays]. If they were simply paying lip service to local news reporting,
most would not have suggested that it be scheduled during the times
they are most likely to be listening to news on public radio.
But the data are also an indication that most public radio news listeners
would prefer to have it all - uninterrupted network news programming
and a complete, in-depth local news report. Due to formatic constraints
and limited resources, most public stations cannot adequately provide
all the in-depth coverage that avid news listeners want. Many stations
have difficulty producing one network-quality report a day, let alone
an entire program. For most stations, the best strategy will be to continue
providing local information in and around prime-time network programming.
THE QUALITY and PLACEMENT
of LOCAL NEWS
| "They intersperse local news stories
during Morning Edition and All Things Considered." |
Because of its importance, listeners were asked about the quality
of local news several times during the survey. Overall, local news
is considered to be very good while national news is rated as excellent.
How does local reporting fare when compared directly with NPR news?

Over half of surveyed listeners agree that the quality of local and
national reporting is comparable, while 42% disagree. Most responses
are near the middle of the scale, with relatively few listeners strongly
agreeing or disagreeing with the statement.
How Much Local News, Where
& When?
The data have shown that most listeners approve of the broad spectrum
of national, international, state, and local news they receive on public
radio. But how much local news do they want, and when do they want it?
The fact that there is some pent-up desire for local reporting is indicated
by the 64% who agree that there are important state and local news stories
they do not hear on their local public station.

This is more evidence that news listeners want to hear local news during
the times they are most likely to be tuned into public radio. More than
three-in-four agree that any additional state and local reporting should
be included in Morning Edition and All Things Considered.

There is a slight difference between the amount of local news listeners
want in the morning or afternoon, as 71% agree that they would like
at least ten minutes of in-depth state and local reporting during each
hour of Morning Edition, and 66% desire the same during All Things Considered.
As positively as most listeners feel about state and local news programming,
stations must exercise caution when integrating news into network programming.

Over three-quarters of listeners agree that local news should not usurp
national news in network programs. There were some listeners who felt
that the quality of local news could not consistently measure up to
the network product.
· "We've been spoiled by such good national reporting,
I'd hate to see local news done in a 'second class' way."
· "And if it's a zero sum game, I would not like them
to trim what they're doing [nationally] in order to do more local
stuff."
· "I'd be willing to put the extra [local news] time into
[ME/ATC] if they were well produced stories, but I'm nervous about
it."
· "Let NPR have that 5 minutes, instead of turning out
something bland and kind of halfway. Just say 'we can't do this, so
we're not going to screw around'."
· "There is something to be said for interspersing local
news and for having a separate local program. But it can't be fill
or fluff, it's got to be good. Don't just fill up ten minutes just
because you've got ten minutes to fill."
This information may seem to be at odds with the strong support for
hearing local news reports in prime listening times during and adjacent
to Morning Edition and All Things Considered. The result is not as contradictory
as it may appear on the surface. This is because of the way listeners
define Morning Edition and All Things Considered, and due to their perceptions
about the construction and content of these programs.
Most listeners perceive Morning Edition or All Things Considered as
the programs they are now hearing on their station, with a mix of local
and national news. Based on their reactions in this study, relatively
few consider that there is a version of these programs emanating from
NPR with fifty-nine minutes per hour of exclusively national and international
news, and no local inserts. Most already accept the local newscasts
and in-depth stories that the station provides. They believe that network
programs are designed to accommodate local news, and that stations and
the network have a structure through which both are presented without
conflicting. This perception causes listeners to believe that they are
not "missing" any national reporting, and makes a mixture
of local and national news acceptable, since they believe that stations
only air local reports during the times designated by the Morning Edition
or All Things Considered format.
· "I think of both the local and national news as Morning
Edition."
· "I don't think that we care, as long as the content
is interesting."
· "I think it means that they're doing a good job if we
don't notice which ones are local or national."
· "I expect both in-depth local and network reports. I
weight them equal. I have no sense of exactly when these things come
on, but there is a rhythm to it."
|
When the choice between national and local
reporting is presented as an either/or situation, most listeners
will prefer national news. But when listeners have the option
of compatibly integrating local and network product, most prefer
a combination of national and local reporting.
|
News listeners, who enjoy the consistency of regular,
predictable transitions [especially during Morning Edition], have
the same feelings about scheduling local news reports.

A virtually unanimous 93% prefer to have state and local news reporting
heard at the same time every day. Consistency should raise listener
awareness of local news reporting.
The Financial Value of Locally
Produced News
Individual giving is a complex process. Very few listeners to public
radio become givers for any single reason. Survey questions asked if
the perceived expansion of local news would provide an incentive or
a deterrent to individual giving.

Among current givers, 83% felt that expanded local news would have
no direct influence on the amount of their financial support. Only 19%
of non-givers felt that more state and local news coverage would increase
the likelihood of their financial support for their public station.
No station should increase local news or any other format with the
sole intent of acquiring larger contributions or more givers. Giving
is based on loyalty and perceptions of programming value and importance,
but it cannot be predicted by a single survey question. Rather, this
data indicates that local news is not an impediment to individual giving,
and it exerts more of a positive than a negative influence on the amount
or likelihood of news listeners' contributions.
Opportunities for Local
News Programming
Optimizing the integration of local and national news product in network
programming will require additional research and discussion beyond this
study. But there are some areas where Morning Edition and All Things
Considered may be bolstered by the inclusion of quality, in-depth local
reporting.
In focus groups, repetition and "rollover fatigue" was mentioned
in conjunction with Morning Edition and All Things Considered listening.
Might this provide an opportunity for integrating local news reports?

While one listener's third repeat is another's first opportunity to
hear a story, these questions give some perspective to the impact that
repetition has on listener attention spans. 56% of agree [18% strongly
agree] that hearing the same story on the news magazines often causes
them to tune away. But more than three-fourths agree [34% strongly]
that they would prefer hearing an original local news story to a national
repeat.
It is important that each station consult their Arbitron listening
data to more precisely calculate the number of listeners that are likely
to hear a specific segment repeated in any network programming that
is rolled-over. All things being equal, keeping local and national reports
fresh will add to their value.
Interesting Subjects for Local
News Reporting
Many comments during the focus groups demonstrate that the interest
generated by the story, not the place where it originated, is the most
important factor in their listening.
· "If there were issues that were common to all communities
and they could talk about how they are being played out on a local
basis, local news could be of interest to all without being metropolitan
or state news."
· "My listening is content-based, not program-based."
· "Some things are not literally local news but it's news
of interest to almost anyone because it might affect you."
· "If I'm interested in it, it's local news to me."
· "What's important is the subject and if it's interesting."
A variety of local angles were suggested. Many involve producing stories
on the local level that are similar in style to those heard on network
programs, or doing local follow-ups on national stories.
· "I'd like local to be the flip side of the national
and international coverage. All the issues they talk about on Morning
Edition and All Things Considered, at some point we're facing the
same challenges locally."
· "Like the in-depth human interest stories you hear nationally
and we could do more of that locally."
· "I would appreciate if they had real statewide news,
with reporters in key areas around the state, and do with state news
what NPR does with national and international news."
· "Add any interesting, compelling local story, not just
in the sense of human interest, but, things that are intriguing about
how we live today."
· "News that impacts our lives here, that can be affected
by what we do here; doesn't have to be government, can be business
news or just what people are doing" [defined by impact than by
where it takes place]
· "Bringing national stories down to a local impact"
· "An absence of local shootings and junk news, sensational
news, stuff that's repulsive."
· "What happens in the Capitol that affects my region
is local to me."
· "I'd like to hear more about the impact of national
issues on local stories."
· "Sometimes it seems as though they have a teaching function.
They'll take something nobody knows about and tell you enough about
it that you can understand the conversation or educate yourself further."
· "I am educated about things I never would have even
thought about, I'm learning some new thought, concept or idea every
day."
Public radio listeners do not expect happy talk, but if there is positive
news to report, or a constructive situation that influences their lives
to be mentioned, most listeners would approve.
· "We don't want it to become happy talk, but there's
very little in the news right now that makes you feel good about your
community."
· "Highlight people and their achievements in the community
maybe people could see that and use it as an example."
· "Hear some inspiring, positive stories. It's nice to
hear that not everybody is a stinker."
· "We cover a lot of policies but we don't actually get
into the community to see what's going on, you don't see positive
or what can be done"
· "Things that I could participate with, if I hear something
about Russia, I'm not going to have a great deal of influence over
it, but something local that might effect me or I can participate
in, how they effect schools, or taxes."
Many public radio listeners want to hear "the real story"
of what occurs in their communities. Stories about power brokers and
the individuals and businesses that have a strong influence on the community
would be of interest.
· "In policy and politics, there's a lot going on behind
the scenes that we really don't see or understand, how so some of
these policies impact us?"
· "I like it when they cover controversial issues that
you will not hear any other stations or media cover around here. Things
you really want to hear about but no one else will touch with a ten
foot pole, they do a great job of that."
TOP
Market
Trends Research Incorporated
727-784-0967
info@MarketTrendsResearch.com
© 2000-2009 Market Trends Research Inc.